Ir para o conteúdo

Esta tradução da interface é um rascunho e não foi revisada por falante nativo. O inglês é a versão de origem. English

UK stealth-bot bill heads to second reading with publisher and Reddit backing

16 de out. de 2026 · Coletado automaticamente de fontes públicas. Não revisado por uma pessoa.

Este item só está disponível no idioma original (inglês).

What happened

A bill requiring bots to declare who operates them and what they will use scraped content for - the Automated Online Software (Access and Transparency) Bill, introduced by Damian Hinds MP - was scheduled for its second reading in the House of Commons on Friday, October 16, 2026. Reporting on October 21, trade publication InPublishing describes a growing transatlantic push to unmask AI "stealth bots."

What the bill would do

Bots would have to identify their operator and state the purpose of content collection, letting content owners decide whether to allow the scraping or seek a licensing deal. The bill would not regulate AI models or dictate who can access websites; protections would extend to any organization with a website.

Why publishers back it

Nineteen of the UK's 20 most popular news websites can currently be scraped by commercially available stealth-bot tools despite paywalls and bot-blocking technology, per InPublishing. News Media Association CEO Theo Bamber: "AI firms are already paying for journalism, just not to the people who produce it." Supporters named include UK news publishers, Reddit and Fastly. The bill mirrors the bipartisan Stealth Bot Prohibition Bill before the US Congress; New York's legislature has passed a similar bill awaiting the governor's signature.

Scope note

Legislative item, not a lawsuit. No AI company is named as a defendant; frontier-model trainers are linked as reference because their scraping practices are the target of the bill.

Fontes